Shaping the Globular Cluster Mass Function by Stellar-Dynamical Evaporation

Abstract

We show that the globular cluster mass function (GCMF) in the Milky Way depends on cluster half-mass density (rhoh) in the sense that the turnover mass MTO increases with rhoh while the width of the GCMF decreases. We argue that this is the expected signature of the slow erosion of a mass function that initially rose towards low masses, predominantly through cluster evaporation driven by internal two-body relaxation. We find excellent agreement between the observed GCMF -- including its dependence on internal density rhoh, central concentration c, and Galactocentric distance rgc -- and a simple model in which the relaxation-driven mass-loss rates of clusters are approximated by -dM/dt = muev ~ rhoh1/2. In particular, we recover the well-known insensitivity of MTO to rgc. This feature does not derive from a literal ``universality'' of the GCMF turnover mass, but rather from a significant variation of MTO with rhoh -- the expected outcome of relaxation-driven cluster disruption -- plus significant scatter in rhoh as a function of rgc. Our conclusions are the same if the evaporation rates are assumed to depend instead on the mean volume or surface densities of clusters inside their tidal radii, as muev ~ rhot1/2 or muev ~ Sigmat3/4 -- alternative prescriptions that are physically motivated but involve cluster properties (rhot and Sigmat) that are not as well defined or as readily observable as rhoh. In all cases, the normalization of muev required to fit the GCMF implies cluster lifetimes that are within the range of standard values (although falling towards the low end of this range). Our analysis does not depend on any assumptions or information about velocity anisotropy in the globular cluster system.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…