Nearly Tight Frames and Space-Frequency Analysis on Compact Manifolds
Abstract
Let M be a smooth compact oriented Riemannian manifold, and let be the Laplace-Beltrami operator on M. Say 0 ≠ f ∈ S(+), and that f(0) = 0. For t > 0, let Kt(x,y) denote the kernel of f(t2 ). Suppose f satisfies Daubechies' criterion, and b > 0. For each j, write M as a disjoint union of measurable sets Ej,k with diameter at most baj, and comparable to baj if baj is sufficiently small. Take xj,k ∈ Ej,k. We then show that the functions φj,k(x)=[μ(Ej,k)]1/2 Kaj(xj,k,x) form a frame for (I-P)L2( M), for b sufficiently small (here P is the projection onto the constant functions). Moreover, we show that the ratio of the frame bounds approaches 1 nearly quadratically as the dilation parameter approaches 1, so that the frame quickly becomes nearly tight (for b sufficiently small). Moreover, based upon how well-localized a function F ∈ (I-P)L2 is in space and in frequency, we can describe which terms in the summation F SF = Σj Σk < F,φj,k > φj,k are so small that they can be neglected. If n=2 and M is the torus or the sphere, and f(s)=se-s (the "Mexican hat" situation), we obtain two explicit approximate formulas for the φj,k, one to be used when t is large, and one to be used when t is small. Finally we explain in what sense the kernel Kt(x,y) should itself be regarded as a continuous wavelet on M, and characterize the H\"older continuous functions on M by the size of their continuous wavelet transforms, for H\"older exponents strictly between 0 and 1.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.