Weighted Random Popular Matchings
Abstract
For a set A of n applicants and a set I of m items, we consider a problem of computing a matching of applicants to items, i.e., a function M mapping A to I; here we assume that each applicant x ∈ A provides a preference list on items in I. We say that an applicant x ∈ A prefers an item p than an item q if p is located at a higher position than q in its preference list, and we say that x prefers a matching M over a matching M' if x prefers M(x) over M'(x). For a given matching problem A, I, and preference lists, we say that M is more popular than M' if the number of applicants preferring M over M' is larger than that of applicants preferring M' over M, and M is called a popular matching if there is no other matching that is more popular than M. Here we consider the situation that A is partitioned into A1,A2,...,Ak, and that each Ai is assigned a weight wi>0 such that w1>w2>...>wk>0. For such a matching problem, we say that M is more popular than M' if the total weight of applicants preferring M over M' is larger than that of applicants preferring M' over M, and we call M an k-weighted popular matching if there is no other matching that is more popular than M. In this paper, we analyze the 2-weighted matching problem, and we show that (lower bound) if m/n4/3=o(1), then a random instance of the 2-weighted matching problem with w1 ≥ 2w2 has a 2-weighted popular matching with probability o(1); and (upper bound) if n4/3/m = o(1), then a random instance of the 2-weighted matching problem with w1 ≥ 2w2$ has a 2-weighted popular matching with probability 1-o(1).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.