Perfect domination in rectangular grid graphs
Abstract
A dominating set S in a graph G is said to be perfect if every vertex of G not in S is adjacent to just one vertex of S. Given a vertex subset S' of a side Pm of an m× n grid graph G, the perfect dominating sets S in G with S'=S V(Pm) can be determined via an exhaustive algorithm of running time O(2m+n). Extending to infinite grid graphs of width m-1, periodicity makes the binary decision tree of prunable into a finite threaded tree, a closed walk of which yields all such sets S. The graphs induced by the complements of such sets S can be codified by arrays of ordered pairs of positive integers via , for the growth and determination of which a speedier %greedy algorithm exists. %and their periodic structure, further studied. A recent characterization of grid graphs having total perfect codes S (with just 1-cubes as induced components), due to Klostermeyer and Goldwasser, is given in terms of , which allows to show that these sets S are restrictions of only one total perfect code S1 in the integer lattice graph of 2. Moreover, the complement -S1 yields an aperiodic tiling, like the Penrose tiling. In contrast, the parallel, horizontal, total perfect codes in are in 1-1 correspondence with the doubly infinite \0,1\-sequences.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.