Comparison of Standard Ruler and Standard Candle constraints on Dark Energy Models
Abstract
We compare the dark energy model constraints obtained by using recent standard ruler data (Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) at z=0.2 and z=0.35 and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) shift parameters R and la) with the corresponding constraints obtained by using recent Type Ia Supernovae (SnIa) standard candle data (ESSENCE+SNLS+HST from Davis et. al.). We find that, even though both classes of data are consistent with LCDM at the 2σ level, there is a systematic difference between the two classes of data. In particular, we find that for practically all values of the parameters (0m,b) in the 2σ range of the the 3-year WMAP data (WMAP3) best fit, LCDM is significantly more consistent with the SnIa data than with the CMB+BAO data. For example for (0m,b)=(0.24,0.042) corresponding to the best fit values of WMAP3, the dark energy equation of state parametrization w(z)=w0 + w1 (z/(1+z)) best fit is at a 0.5σ distance from LCDM (w0=-1,w1=0) using the SnIa data and 1.7σ away from LCDM using the CMB+BAO data. There is a similar trend in the earlier data (SNLS vs CMB+BAO at z=0.35). This trend is such that the standard ruler CMB+BAO data show a mild preference for crossing of the phantom divide line w=-1, while the recent SnIa data favor LCDM. Despite of this mild difference in trends, we find no statistically significant evidence for violation of the cosmic distance duality relation η dL(z)/(dA(z) (1+z)2)=1. For example, using a prior of 0m=0.24, we find η=0.95 0.025 in the redshift range 0<z<2, which is consistent with distance duality at the 2σ level.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.