The inverse problem for representation functions for general linear forms

Abstract

The inverse problem for representation functions takes as input a triple (X,f,L), where X is a countable semigroup, f : X --> N0 ∞ a function, L : a1 x1 + ... + ah xh an X-linear form and asks for a subset A ⊂eq X such that there are f(x) solutions (counted appropriately) to L(x1,...,xh) = x for every x ∈ X, or a proof that no such subset exists. This paper represents the first systematic study of this problem for arbitrary linear forms when X = Z, the setting which in many respects is the most natural one. Having first settled on the "right" way to count representations, we prove that every primitive form has a unique representation basis, i.e.: a set A which represents the function f 1. We also prove that a partition regular form (i.e.: one for which no non-empty subset of the coefficients sums to zero) represents any function f for which f-1(0) has zero asymptotic density. These two results answer questions recently posed by Nathanson. The inverse problem for partition irregular forms seems to be more complicated. The simplest example of such a form is x1 - x2, and for this form we provide some partial results. Several remaining open problems are discussed.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…