A deep INTEGRAL hard X-ray survey of the 3C 273/Coma region

Abstract

(abridged) We present an analysis of the deepest hard X-ray survey to date of about 2500 deg2 performed by the IBIS instrument on board INTEGRAL in the 20-60 keV band, with a total exposure time of 4 Ms. We find 34 candidate sources. The ratio of Seyfert 1 to Seyfert 2 is significantly more than the ratio found in the optical, which may be evidence for a receding torus, but could also be due to absorption columns > 1025 cm-2. None of the predicted Compton-thick objects is detected unambiguously; when taking lower limits on Nh into account, the fraction of these objects is found to be lower than 24%. We do not see, but cannot exclude, a relationship between absorption and luminosity similar to what is seen in the 2-10 keV band. Our data suggests the possibility of a lack of objects with 1021 < Nh < 1022 cm-2, as expected if absorption originates either in a torus-like structure or in the host galaxy. We find that the Log N-Log S diagram of our sources is compatible with those obtained in other surveys in hard X-rays. Compared to models of the AGN population selected in the 2-10 keV band, the Log N-Log S diagram is generally in good agreement, but the Nh distribution is significantly different, with significantly less unabsorbed sources (Nh<1022 cm-2) at a given flux limit compared to the models. We resolve here about 2.5% of the cosmic X-ray background. We also study the local hard X-ray luminosity function, which is compatible with what is found in other recent hard X-ray surveys. The characteristic luminosity Log L*20-60 keV=43.66 is found to be a factor about 5 lower than the value observed in the 2-10 keV band. We find a space density of 10-3 AGN with L>1041 per Mpc3 and a corresponding luminosity density of 0.9 1039 erg s-1 Mpc-3.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…