X-ray absorption in Compton-thin AGN: the predictions of a model revisited

Abstract

The evidence of a decrease with increasing luminosity of the fraction fabs of absorbed and Compton-thin among X-ray (2-10 keV) selected AGN is observationally rather well supported, while that of an increase of fabs with redshift is rather controversial. In Lamastra, Perola & Matt (2006) the gravitational effect of the SMBH on the molecular interstellar gas, in the central region of the host galaxy, was shown to predict an anti-correlation between fabs and MBH. The most recent findings on the distribution of the Eddington ratio λ=Lb/LE as a function of MBH and z are used to convert that relationship into one between fabs and both bolometric (Lb) and X-ray (LX) luminosities at various values of z. The findings on λ(MBH,z) are properly treated in order to ensure completeness in the prediction of fabs above a certain luminosity, at values of z=0.1, 0.35, 0.7 and >1. To verify the consequence of these findings alone, we adopted in a first istance a distribution of gas surface density , observed in a sample of local spiral galaxies, irrespective of the galaxy morphological type and z. Assuming in the λ(MBH,z) distribution the Eddington limit, λ=1, as a ``natural'' cut-off, the predictions are consistent with the existence of an anti-correlation between fabs and LX, but fail to reproduce an increase of fabs with z. Because the early type galaxies on average are much poorer in molecular gas than late type ones, a quantitative agreement with the local value of fabs requires the existence of a correlation between and the central activity. An increase of typical values of with z, correlated with the activity, might explain an increase of fabs with z. However, at the highest luminosities fabs could hardly exceed about 0.3.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…