New results on the least common multiple of consecutive integers

Abstract

When studying the least common multiple of some finite sequences of integers, the first author introduced the interesting arithmetic functions gk (k ∈ N), defined by gk(n) := n (n + 1) ... (n + k)(n, n + 1, >..., n + k) (∀ n ∈ N \0\). He proved that gk (k ∈ N) is periodic and k! is a period of gk. He raised the open problem consisting to determine the smallest positive period Pk of gk. Very recently, S. Hong and Y. Yang have improved the period k! of gk to (1, 2, ..., k). In addition, they have conjectured that Pk is always a multiple of the positive integer (1, 2, >..., k, k + 1)k + 1. An immediate consequence of this conjecture states that if (k + 1) is prime then the exact period of gk is precisely equal to (1, 2, ..., k). In this paper, we first prove the conjecture of S. Hong and Y. Yang and then we give the exact value of Pk (k ∈ N). We deduce, as a corollary, that Pk is equal to the part of (1, 2, ..., k) not divisible by some prime.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…