Constraints on the star formation histories of galaxies from z~1 to z~0

Abstract

We present a new method to estimate the average star formation rate per unit stellar mass (SSFR) of a stacked population of galaxies. We combine the spectra of 600-1000 galaxies with similar stellar masses and parameterise the star formation history of this stacked population using a set of exponentially declining functions. The strength of the Hydrogen Balmer absorption line series in the rest-frame wavelength range 3750-4150 is used to constrain the SSFR by comparing with a library of models generated using the BC03 stellar population code. Our method, based on a principal component analysis (PCA), can be applied in a consistent way to spectra drawn from local galaxy surveys and from surveys at z 1, and is only weakly influenced by attenuation due to dust. We apply our method to galaxy samples drawn from SDSS and DEEP2 to study mass-dependent growth of galaxies from z 1 to z 0. We find that, (1) high mass galaxies have lower SSFRs than low mass galaxies; (2) the average SSFR has decreased from z=1 to z=0 by a factor of 3-4, independent of galaxy mass. Additionally, at z 1 our average SSFRs are a factor of 2-2.5 lower than those derived from multi-wavelength photometry using similar datasets. We then compute the average time (in units of the Hubble time, t H(z)) needed by galaxies of a given mass to form their stars at their current rate. At both z=0 and at z=1, this timescale decreases strongly with stellar mass from values close to unity for galaxies with masses 1010 M, to more than ten for galaxies more massive than 1011 M. Our results are in good agreement with models in which AGN feedback is more efficient at preventing gas from cooling and forming stars in high mass galaxies.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…