A robust morphological classification of high-redshift galaxies using support vector machines on seeing limited images. II. Quantifying morphological k-correction in the COSMOS field at 1<z<2: Ks band vs. I band

Abstract

We quantify the effects of morphological k-correction at 1<z<2 by comparing morphologies measured in the K and I-bands in the COSMOS area. Ks-band data have indeed the advantage of probing old stellar populations for z<2, enabling a determination of galaxy morphological types unaffected by recent star formation. In paper I we presented a new non-parametric method to quantify morphologies of galaxies on seeing limited images based on support vector machines. Here we use this method to classify 50 000 Ks selected galaxies in the COSMOS area observed with WIRCam at CFHT. The obtained classification is used to investigate the redshift distributions and number counts per morphological type up to z2 and to compare to the results obtained with HST/ACS in the I-band on the same objects from other works. We associate to every galaxy with Ks<21.5 and z<2 a probability between 0 and 1 of being late-type or early-type. The classification is found to be reliable up to z2. The mean probability is p0.8. It decreases with redshift and with size, especially for the early-type population but remains above p0.7. The classification is globally in good agreement with the one obtained using HST/ACS for z<1. Above z1, the I-band classification tends to find less early-type galaxies than the Ks-band one by a factor 1.5 which might be a consequence of morphological k-correction effects. We argue therefore that studies based on I-band HST/ACS classifications at z>1 could be underestimating the elliptical population. [abridged]

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…