K-theory of Leavitt path algebras
Abstract
Let E be a row-finite quiver and let E0 be the set of vertices of E; consider the adjacency matrix N'E=(nij)∈(E0× E0), nij=#\ arrows from i to j\. Write NtE and 1 for the matrices ∈ (E0× E0(E)) which result from N'tE and from the identity matrix after removing the columns corresponding to sinks. We consider the K-theory of the Leavitt algebra LR(E)=L(E) R. We show that if R is either a Noetherian regular ring or a stable C*-algebra, then there is an exact sequence (n∈) \[ Kn(R)(E0(E))1-NEt Kn(R)(E0) Kn(LR(E)) Kn-1(R)(E0(E)) \] We also show that for general R, the obstruction for having a sequence as above is measured by twisted nil-K-groups. If we replace K-theory by homotopy algebraic K-theory, the obstructions dissapear, and we get, for every ring R, a long exact sequence \[ KHn(R)(E0(E))1-NEtKHn(R)(E0) KHn(LR(E)) KHn-1(R)(E0(E)) \] We also compare, for a C*-algebra , the algebraic K-theory of L(E) with the topological K-theory of the Cuntz-Krieger algebra C*(E). We show that the map \[ Kn(L(E)) Kn(C*(E)) \] is an isomorphism if is stable and n∈, and also if =, n 0, E is finite with no sinks, and (1-NEt) 0.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.