Simultaneous support recovery in high dimensions: Benefits and perils of block 1/∞-regularization

Abstract

Consider the use of 1/∞-regularized regression for joint estimation of a × matrix of regression coefficients. We analyze the high-dimensional scaling of 1/∞-regularized quadratic programming, considering both consistency in ∞-norm, and variable selection. We begin by establishing bounds on the ∞-error as well sufficient conditions for exact variable selection for fixed and random designs. Our second set of results applies to = 2 linear regression problems with standard Gaussian designs whose supports overlap in a fraction α ∈ [0,1] of their entries: for this problem class, we prove that the 1/∞-regularized method undergoes a phase transition--that is, a sharp change from failure to success--characterized by the rescaled sample size θ1,∞(n, p, s, α) = n/\(4 - 3 α) s (p-(2- α) s)\. An implication of this threshold is that use of 1 / ∞-regularization yields improved statistical efficiency if the overlap parameter is large enough (α > 2/3), but has worse statistical efficiency than a naive Lasso-based approach for moderate to small overlap (α < 2/3). These results indicate that some caution needs to be exercised in the application of 1/∞ block regularization: if the data does not match its structure closely enough, it can impair statistical performance relative to computationally less expensive schemes.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…