On the Davenport constant and group algebras

Abstract

For a finite abelian group G and a splitting field K of G, let d(G, K) denote the largest integer l ∈ for which there is a sequence S = g1 · ... · gl over G such that (Xg1 - a1) · ... · (Xgl - al) 0 ∈ K[G] for all a1, ..., al ∈ K×. If D(G) denotes the Davenport constant of G, then there is the straightforward inequality D(G)-1 d (G, K). Equality holds for a variety of groups, and a standing conjecture of W. Gao et.al. states that equality holds for all groups. We offer further groups for which equality holds, but we also give the first examples of groups G for which D(G) -1 < d(G, K) holds. Thus we disprove the conjecture.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…