On the possible exceptions for the transcendence of the log-gamma function at rational entries
Abstract
In a recent work [JNT 129, 2154 (2009)], Gun and co-workers have claimed that the number \,(x) + (1-x)\,, x being a rational number between 0 and 1, is transcendental with at most one possible exception, but the proof presented there in that work is incorrect. Here in this paper, I point out the mistake they committed and I present a theorem that establishes the transcendence of those numbers with at most two possible exceptions. As a consequence, I make use of the reflection property of this function to establish a criteria for the transcendence of \,π, a number whose irrationality is not proved yet. This has an interesting consequence for the transcendence of the product \,π · e, another number whose irrationality remains unproven.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.