Reply to comment on "Doping Driven ($\pi,0$) Nesting and Magnetic Properties of Fe$_{1+x}$Te Superconductors"

Abstract

Inclusion of correlation effects affects quantitatively the agreement with experiment as far as the value of energy shift and the level of doping is concerned, and our original statement that nesting at ($\pi$,0) can be responsible for magnetic behavior of FeTe is hereby reinstated.