The Posterior Distribution of sin(i) Values For Exoplanets With MT sin(i) Determined From Radial Velocity Data

Abstract

Radial velocity (RV) observations of an exoplanet system giving a value of MT sin(i) condition (i.e. give information about) not only the planet's true mass MT but also the value of sin(i) (where i is the orbital inclination angle). Thus the value of sin(i) for a system with any particular observed value of MT sin(i) cannot be assumed to be drawn randomly from a uniform distribution between zero and unity (corresponding to an isotropic i distribution). The actual distribution from which it is drawn depends on the intrinsic distribution of MT for the exoplanet population being studied. We give a simple Bayesian derivation of this relationship and apply it to several "toy models" for the (currently unknown) intrinsic distribution of MT. The results show that the effect can be an important one. For example, even for simple power-law distributions of MT, the median value of sin(i) in an observed RV sample can vary between 0.25 and 0.71 (as compared to the 0.5 value for an isotropic i distribution) for indices of the power-law in the quite plausible range between -2 and -0.5, respectively. Over the same range of indicies, the 95% confidence upper bound on MT ranges from 4.5 to 400 times larger than MT sin(i), respectively, due to sin(i) uncertainty alone. More complex, but still simple and plausible, distributions of MT yield still more complicated and less intuitive sin(i) distributions. In particular, if the MT distribution contains any characteristic mass scale Mc, the sin(i) distribution will depend on the ratio of MT sin(i) to Mc, often in a non-trivial way. Our qualitative conclusion is that RV studies of exoplanets, both individual objects and statistical samples, should regard the sin(i) factor as more than a "numerical constant of order unity" with simple and well understood statistical properties. (abridged)

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…