Noether's problem for S4 and S5
Abstract
Let k be a field, G be a finite group and k(xg:g∈ G) be the rational function field over k, on which G acts by k-automorphisms defined by h· xg=xhg for any g,h∈ G. Noether's problem asks whether the fixed subfield k(G):=k(xg:g∈ G)G is k-rational, i.e.\ purely transcendental over k. If Sn is the double cover of the symmetric group Sn, in which the liftings of transpositions and products of disjoint transpositions are of order 4, Serre shows that Q(S4) and Q(S5) are not Q-rational. We will prove that, if k is a field such that char k ≠ 2, 3, and k(ζ8) is a cyclic extension of k, then k(S4) is k-rational. If it is assumed furthermore that chark=0, then k(S5) is also k-rational.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.