Schnyder decompositions for regular plane graphs and application to drawing

Abstract

Schnyder woods are decompositions of simple triangulations into three edge-disjoint spanning trees crossing each other in a specific way. In this article, we define a generalization of Schnyder woods to d-angulations (plane graphs with faces of degree d) for all d≥ 3. A Schnyder decomposition is a set of d spanning forests crossing each other in a specific way, and such that each internal edge is part of exactly d-2 of the spanning forests. We show that a Schnyder decomposition exists if and only if the girth of the d-angulation is d. As in the case of Schnyder woods (d=3), there are alternative formulations in terms of orientations ("fractional" orientations when d≥ 5) and in terms of corner-labellings. Moreover, the set of Schnyder decompositions on a fixed d-angulation of girth d is a distributive lattice. We also show that the structures dual to Schnyder decompositions (on d-regular plane graphs of mincut d rooted at a vertex v*) are decompositions into d spanning trees rooted at v* such that each edge not incident to v* is used in opposite directions by two trees. Additionally, for even values of d, we show that a subclass of Schnyder decompositions, which are called even, enjoy additional properties that yield a reduced formulation; in the case d=4, these correspond to well-studied structures on simple quadrangulations (2-orientations and partitions into 2 spanning trees). In the case d=4, the dual of even Schnyder decompositions yields (planar) orthogonal and straight-line drawing algorithms. For a 4-regular plane graph G of mincut 4 with n vertices plus a marked vertex v, the vertices of G v are placed on a (n-1) × (n-1) grid according to a permutation pattern, and in the orthogonal drawing each of the 2n-2 edges of G v has exactly one bend. Embedding also the marked vertex v is doable at the cost of two additional rows and columns and 8 additional bends for the 4 edges incident to v. We propose a further compaction step for the drawing algorithm and show that the obtained grid-size is strongly concentrated around 25n/32× 25n/32 for a uniformly random instance with n vertices.

0

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…