Pauli graphs when the Hilbert space dimension contains a square: why the Dedekind psi function ?

Abstract

We study the commutation relations within the Pauli groups built on all decompositions of a given Hilbert space dimension q, containing a square, into its factors. Illustrative low dimensional examples are the quartit (q=4) and two-qubit (q=22) systems, the octit (q=8), qubit/quartit (q=2× 4) and three-qubit (q=23) systems, and so on. In the single qudit case, e.g. q=4,8,12,..., one defines a bijection between the σ (q) maximal commuting sets [with σ[q) the sum of divisors of q] of Pauli observables and the maximal submodules of the modular ring Zq2, that arrange into the projective line P1(Zq) and a independent set of size σ (q)-(q) [with (q) the Dedekind psi function]. In the multiple qudit case, e.g. q=22, 23, 32,..., the Pauli graphs rely on symplectic polar spaces such as the generalized quadrangles GQ(2,2) (if q=22) and GQ(3,3) (if q=32). More precisely, in dimension pn (p a prime) of the Hilbert space, the observables of the Pauli group (modulo the center) are seen as the elements of the 2n-dimensional vector space over the field Fp. In this space, one makes use of the commutator to define a symplectic polar space W2n-1(p) of cardinality σ(p2n-1), that encodes the maximal commuting sets of the Pauli group by its totally isotropic subspaces. Building blocks of W2n-1(p) are punctured polar spaces (i.e. a observable and all maximum cliques passing to it are removed) of size given by the Dedekind psi function (p2n-1). For multiple qudit mixtures (e.g. qubit/quartit, qubit/octit and so on), one finds multiple copies of polar spaces, ponctured polar spaces, hypercube geometries and other intricate structures. Such structures play a role in the science of quantum information.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…