The convex real projective orbifolds with radial or totally geodesic ends: The closedness and openness of deformations

Abstract

A real projective orbifold is an n-dimensional orbifold modeled on RPn with the group PGL(n+1, R). We concentrate on an orbifold that contains a compact codimension 0 submanifold whose complement is a union of neighborhoods of ends, diffeomorphic to closed (n-1)-dimensional orbifolds times intervals. A real projective orbifold has a radial end if a neighborhood of the end is foliated by projective geodesics that develop into geodesics ending at a common point. It has a totally geodesic end if the end can be completed to have the totally geodesic boundary. The orbifold is said to be convex if any path can be homotopied to a projective geodesic with endpoints fixed. A real projective structure sometimes admits deformations to parameters of real projective structures. We will prove the local homeomorphism between the deformation space of convex real projective structures on such an orbifold with radial or totally geodesic ends with various conditions with the PGL(n+1, R)-character space of the fundamental group with corresponding conditions. We will use a Hessian argument to show that under a small deformation, a properly (resp. strictly) convex real projective orbifold with generalized admissible ends will remain properly and properly (resp. strictly) convex with generalized admissible ends. Lastly, we will prove the openness and closedness of the properly (resp. strictly) convex real projective structures on a class of orbifold with generalized admissible ends, where we need the theory of Crampon-Marquis and Cooper, Long and Tillmann on the Margulis lemma for convex real projective manifolds. The theory here partly generalizes that of Benoist on closed real projective orbifolds.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…