General Non-structure Theory

Abstract

The theme of the first two sections, is to prepare the framework of how from a "complicated" family of index models I in K1 we build many and/or complicated structures in a class K2. The index models are characteristically linear orders, trees with kappa+1 levels (possibly with linear order on the set of successors of a member) and linearly ordered graph, for this we phrase relevant complicatedness properties (called bigness). We say when M in K2 is represented in I in K1. We give sufficient conditions when MI:I∈ K1λ is complicated where for each I in K1lambda we build MI in K2 (usually in K2lambda) represented in it and reflecting to some degree its structure (e.g. for I a linear order we can build a model of an unstable first order class reflecting the order). If we understand enough we can even build e.g. rigid members of K2lambda. Note that we mention "stable", "superstable", but in a self contained way, using an equivalent definition which is useful here and explicitly given. We also frame the use of generalizations of Ramsey and Erdos-Rado theorems to get models in which any I from the relevant K1 is reflected. We give in some detail how this may apply to the class of separable reduced Abelian p-group and how we get relevant models for ordered graphs (via forcing). In the third section we show stronger results concerning linear orders. If for each linear order I of cardinality lambda>aleph0 we can attach a model MI in Klambda in which the linear order can be embedded so that for enough cuts of I, their being omitted is reflected in MI, then there are 2lambda non-isomorphic cases.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…