Generalized Silver Codes

Abstract

For an nt transmit, nr receive antenna system (nt × nr system), a full-rate space time block code (STBC) transmits nmin = min(nt,nr) complex symbols per channel use. The well known Golden code is an example of a full-rate, full-diversity STBC for 2 transmit antennas. Its ML-decoding complexity is of the order of M2.5 for square M-QAM. The Silver code for 2 transmit antennas has all the desirable properties of the Golden code except its coding gain, but offers lower ML-decoding complexity of the order of M2. Importantly, the slight loss in coding gain is negligible compared to the advantage it offers in terms of lowering the ML-decoding complexity. For higher number of transmit antennas, the best known codes are the Perfect codes, which are full-rate, full-diversity, information lossless codes (for nr ≥ nt) but have a high ML-decoding complexity of the order of Mntnmin (for nr < nt, the punctured Perfect codes are considered). In this paper, a scheme to obtain full-rate STBCs for 2a transmit antennas and any nr with reduced ML-decoding complexity of the order of Mnt(nmin-(3/4))-0.5, is presented. The codes constructed are also information lossless for nr ≥ nt, like the Perfect codes and allow higher mutual information than the comparable punctured Perfect codes for nr < nt. These codes are referred to as the generalized Silver codes, since they enjoy the same desirable properties as the comparable Perfect codes (except possibly the coding gain) with lower ML-decoding complexity, analogous to the Silver-Golden codes for 2 transmit antennas. Simulation results of the symbol error rates for 4 and 8 transmit antennas show that the generalized Silver codes match the punctured Perfect codes in error performance while offering lower ML-decoding complexity.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…