On the maximal energy tree with two maximum degree vertices

Abstract

For a simple graph G, the energy E(G) is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all eigenvalues of its adjacent matrix. For ≥ 3 and t≥ 3, denote by Ta(,t) (or simply Ta) the tree formed from a path Pt on t vertices by attaching -1 P2's on each end of the path Pt, and Tb(, t) (or simply Tb) the tree formed from Pt+2 by attaching -1 P2's on an end of the Pt+2 and -2 P2's on the vertex next to the end. In [X. Li, X. Yao, J. Zhang and I. Gutman, Maximum energy trees with two maximum degree vertices, J. Math. Chem. 45(2009), 962--973], Li et al. proved that among trees of order n with two vertices of maximum degree , the maximal energy tree is either the graph Ta or the graph Tb, where t=n+4-4≥ 3. However, they could not determine which one of Ta and Tb is the maximal energy tree. This is because the quasi-order method is invalid for comparing their energies. In this paper, we use a new method to determine the maximal energy tree. It turns out that things are more complicated. We prove that the maximal energy tree is Tb for ≥ 7 and any t≥ 3, while the maximal energy tree is Ta for =3 and any t≥ 3. Moreover, for =4, the maximal energy tree is Ta for all t≥ 3 but t=4, for which Tb is the maximal energy tree. For =5, the maximal energy tree is Tb for all t≥ 3 but t is odd and 3≤ t≤ 89, for which Ta is the maximal energy tree. For =6, the maximal energy tree is Tb for all t≥ 3 but t=3,5,7, for which Ta is the maximal energy tree. One can see that for most , Tb is the maximal energy tree, =5 is a turning point, and =3 and 4 are exceptional cases.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…