Thermodynamics of lattice QCD with 2 sextet quarks on Nt=8 lattices

Abstract

We continue our lattice simulations of QCD with 2 flavours of colour-sextet quarks as a model for conformal or walking technicolor. A 2-loop perturbative calculation of the β-function which describes the evolution of this theory's running coupling constant predicts that it has a second zero at a finite coupling. This non-trivial zero would be an infrared stable fixed point, in which case the theory with massless quarks would be a conformal field theory. However, if the interaction between quarks and antiquarks becomes strong enough that a chiral condensate forms before this IR fixed point is reached, the theory is QCD-like with spontaneously broken chiral symmetry and confinement. However, the presence of the nearby IR fixed point means that there is a range of couplings for which the running coupling evolves very slowly, i.e. it 'walks'. We are simulating the lattice version of this theory with staggered quarks at finite temperature studying the changes in couplings at the deconfinement and chiral-symmetry restoring transitions as the temporal extent (Nt) of the lattice, measured in lattice units, is increased. Our earlier results on lattices with Nt=4,6 show both transitions move to weaker couplings as Nt increases consistent with walking behaviour. In this paper we extend these calculations to Nt=8. Although both transition again move to weaker couplings the change in the coupling at the chiral transition from Nt=6 to Nt=8 is appreciably smaller than that from Nt=4 to Nt=6. This indicates that at Nt=4,6 we are seeing strong coupling effects and that we will need results from Nt > 8 to determine if the chiral-transition coupling approaches zero as Nt → ∞, as needed for the theory to walk.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…