On Spectrum of kappa-Resplendent Models

Abstract

We prove that some natural "outside" property is equivalent (for a first order class) to being stable. For a model, being resplendent is a strengthening of being kappa-saturated. Restricting ourselves to the case kappa > |T| for transparency, a model M is kappa-resplendent means: when we expand M by <kappa individual constants (ci:i < alpha), if (M, ci) i<alpha has an elementary extension expandable to be a model of T' where Th((M,ci)i<alpha) subseteq T', |T'| < kappa then already (M,ci)i<α can be expanded to a model of T'. Trivially any saturated model of cardinality lambda is lambda-resplendent. We ask: how may kappa-resplendent models of a (first order complete) theory T of cardinality lambda are there? Naturally we restrict ourselves to cardinals lambda=lambda kappa + 2 |T|. Then we get a complete and satisfying answer: this depends just on T being stable or unstable. In this case proving that for stable T we get few, is not hard; in fact every resplendent model of T is saturated hence determined by its cardinality up to isomorphism. The inverse is more problematic because naturally we have to use Skolem functions with any alpha<kappa places. Normally we use relevant partition theorems (Ramsey theorem or Erdos-Rado theorem), but in our case the relevant partitions theorems fails so we have to be careful.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…