On functions whose symmetric part of gradient agree and a generalization of Reshetnyak's compactness theorem
Abstract
We consider the following question: Given a connected open domain ⊂ Rn, suppose u,v:→ Rn with (∇ u)>0, (∇ v)>0 a.e. are such that ∇ uT(x)∇ u(x)=∇ v(x)T ∇ v(x) a.e. does this imply a global relation of the form ∇ v(x)= R∇ u(x) a.e. in where R∈ SO(n)? If u,v are C1 it is an exercise to see this true, if u,v∈ W1,1 we show this is false. We prove this question has a positive answer if v∈ W1,1 and u∈ W1,n is a mapping of Lp integrable dilatation for p>n-1. These conditions are sharp in two dimensions and this result represents a generalization of the corollary to Liouville's theorem that states that the differential inclusion ∇ u∈ SO(n) can only be satisfied by an affine mapping. Liouville's corollary for rotations has been generalized by Reshetnyak who proved convergence of gradients to a fixed rotation for any weakly converging sequence vk∈ W1,1 for which ∫ dist(∇ vk,SO(n)) dz→ 0 as k→ ∞. Let S(·) denote the (multiplicative) symmetric part of a matrix. In Theorem 3 we prove an analogous for any pair of weakly converging sequences vk∈ W1,p and uk∈ W1,p(n-1)p-1 (where p∈ [1,n] and the sequence (uk) has its dilatation pointwise bounded above by an Lr integrable function, r>n-1) that satisfy ∫ |S(∇ uk)-S(∇ vk)|p dz→ 0 as k→ ∞ and for which the sign of the (∇ vk) tends to 1 in L1. This result contains Reshetnyak's theorem as the special case (uk) Id, p=1.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.