Planet Engulfment by ~1.5-3 Solar-Mass Red Giants

Abstract

Recent radial-velocity surveys for GK clump giants have revealed that planets also exist around ~1.5-3 Msun stars. However, no planets have been found inside 0.6 AU around clump giants, in contrast to solar-type main-sequence stars, many of which harbor short-period planets such as hot Jupiters. In this study we examine the possibility that planets were engulfed by host stars evolving on the red-giant branch (RGB). We integrate the orbital evolution of planets in the RGB and helium burning (HeB) phases of host stars, including the effects of stellar tide and stellar mass loss. Then we derive the critical semimajor axis (or the survival limit) inside which planets are eventually engulfed by their host stars after tidal decay of their orbits. Especially, we investigate the impact of stellar mass and other stellar parameters on the survival limit in more detail than previous studies. In addition, we make detailed comparison with measured semimajor axes of planets detected so far, which no previous study did. We find that the critical semimajor axis is quite sensitive to stellar mass in the range between 1.7 and 2.1 Msun, which suggests a need for careful comparison between theoretical and observational limits of existence of planets. Our comparison demonstrates that all those planets are beyond the survival limit, which is consistent with the planet-engulfment hypothesis. However, on the high-mass side (> 2.1 Msun), the detected planets are orbiting significantly far from the survival limit, which suggests that engulfment by host stars may not be the main reason for the observed lack of short-period giant planets. To confirm our conclusion, the detection of more planets around clump giants, especially with masses > 2.5 Msun, is required.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…