New Analysis of B → Kπ data with Pauli blocking CP violation in Bo decays, not in B SU(3) use of B → ππ data invalid for B → Kπ

Abstract

New data analysis with Pauli blocking explains observation of CP violation in Bo→ Kπ decays, absence in B → Kπ decays and gives new predictions agreeing with experiment. Branching ratio data show pure I=1/2 amplitude predicted by pure penguin transitions for separate relations within charged and neutral B decays, but strong violation of penguin I=1/2 isospin relation between charged and neutral decays. B(Bo → K+ π-) - 2B(Bo→ Ko πo) = %(19.4 0.6)- 2· (9.4 0.6) = (0.6 1.3)· 10-6 ≈ 0 2B(B+ → K+ πo) - B(B+ → Ko π+) = %(25.8 1.2) - (23.1 1.0) = (2.7 1.6)· 10-6 ≈ 0 τoτ+· 2B(B+ → K+ πo) - B(Bo → K+ π-) = (4.7 0.82)· 10-6 = 0 This contrast between pure I=1/2 observed in individual charged and neutral final states and I=1/2 violation in relations between them is unexpected in previous treatments. Pauli blocking predicts this contrast by noting that two identical u quarks in a relative s-wave are Pauli blocked. Tree diagram b→ s u u for b producing u quark at weak vertex and tree-penguin interference producing CP violation are Pauli suppressed for B+ decays with identical u quark spectator. No suppression in Bo decays with spectator d quark. B→ Kπ data analysis discards all amplitudes containing two identical u quarks in final state and predicts observed isospin relations by using only Pauli-favored amplitudes Bu→ s du d and Bd→ s ud u. Pauli-favored transitions explain dependence on flavor of spectator quark which does not participate in the weak interaction.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…