Long-Distance Contribution to s/ s of the Bs-Bs System

Abstract

We estimate the long-distance contribution to the s of Bs system, based mainly on two-body D(*)s(*)s modes and three-body D(*)s(*)(*) modes (and their CP conjugates). Some higher cs resonances are also considered. The contribution to s/s by two-body modes is 10.2+-3.0%, slightly smaller than the short-distance result of 13.3+-3.2%. The contribution to width difference by D*s0(2317), Ds1(2460), and Ds1(2536) resonances is negligible. For the three-body modes, we adopt the factorization formalism and model the form factors with off-shell D(*)s poles, the DsJ(2700) resonance, and non-resonant (NR) contributions. These three-body modes can arise through current-produced or transition diagrams, but only SU(3)-related D(*)u,d (*) modes from current diagram have been measured so far. The pole model results for D*u,d (*) agree well with data, while Du,d (*) rates agree with data only within a factor of 2 to 3. All measured three-body rates can be reproduced by including NR contribution. The total s/s obtained is 16.7+-8.5%, which agrees with the short-distance result within uncertainties. For illustration, we also demonstrate the effect of DsJ(2700) in modes with D(*)K*. In all scenarios, the total width difference remain consistence to the short-distance result. Our result indicates that (a) the operator product expansion (OPE) in short-distance picture is a valid assumption, (b) approximating the two-body decays to saturate width difference has a large correction, (c) the effect of three-body modes cannot be neglected, and (d) in addition to D(*)s poles, the DsJ(2700) resonance also plays an important role in three-body modes. Future experiments are necessary to improve the estimation of s from long-distance picture.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…