Egyptian Fractions with Restrictions

Abstract

Let To(k) denote the number of solutions of Σi=1k 1xi=1 in odd numbers 1<x1<x2<...<xk. It is clear that To(2k)=0. For distinct primes p1, p2,..., pt, let S(p1, p2,..., pt)=\p1α1...ptαt αi∈ N0, i=1,2,..., t. Let Tk(p1,..., pt) be the number of solutions Σi=1k 1xi=1 with 1<x1<x2<...<xk and xi∈ S(p1, p2,..., pt). It is clear that if Tk(p1,..., pt)= 0 for some k, then the inverse sum of all elements sj>1 in S(p1, p2,..., pt) is more than 1. In this paper we study To(k) and Tk(p1,..., pt). Three of our results are: 1) To(2k+1) ( 2)(k+1)(k-4) for all k 4; 2) if the inverse sum of all elements sj>1 in S(p1, p2,..., pt) is more than 1, then Tk(p1,..., pt)= 0 for infinitely many k and the set of these k is the union of finitely many arithmetic progressions; 3) there exists two constants k0=k0(p1,..., pt)>1 and c=c(p1,..., pt)>1 such that for any k>k0 we have either Tk(p1,..., pt)= 0 or Tk(p1,..., pt)>ck.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…