Haar null sets and the consistent reflection of non-meagreness

Abstract

A subset X of a Polish group G is called Haar null if there exists a Borel set B ⊃ X and Borel probability measure μ on G such that μ(gBh)=0 for every g,h ∈ G. We prove that there exists a set X ⊂ R that is not Lebesgue null and a Borel probability measure μ such that μ(X + t) = 0 for every t ∈ R. This answers a question from David Fremlin's problem list by showing that one cannot simplify the definition of a Haar null set by leaving out the Borel set B. (The answer was already known assuming the Continuum Hypothesis.) This result motivates the following Baire category analogue. It is consistent with ZFC that there exist an abelian Polish group G and a Cantor set C ⊂ G such that for every non-meagre set X ⊂ G there exists a t ∈ G such that C (X + t) is relatively non-meagre in C. This essentially generalises results of Bartoszy\'nski and Burke-Miller.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…