Martin's Maximum and tower forcing

Abstract

There are several examples in the literature showing that compactness-like properties of a cardinal cause poor behavior of some generic ultrapowers which have critical point (Burke MR1472122 when is a supercompact cardinal; Foreman-Magidor MR1359154 when = ω2 in the presence of strong forcing axioms). We prove more instances of this phenomenon. First, the Reflection Principle (RP) implies that if I is a tower of ideals which concentrates on the class GICω1 of ω1-guessing, internally club sets, then I is not presaturated (a set is ω1-guessing iff its transitive collapse has the ω1-approximation property as defined in Hamkins MR2540935). This theorem, combined with work from VWISP, shows that if PFA+ or MM holds and there is an inaccessible cardinal, then there is a tower with critical point ω2 which is not presaturated; moreover this tower is significantly different from the non-presaturated tower already known (by Foreman-Magidor MR1359154) to exist in all models of Martin's Maximum. The conjunction of the Strong Reflection Principle (SRP) and the Tree Property at ω2 has similar implications for towers of ideals which concentrate on the wider class GISω1 of ω1-guessing, internally stationary sets. Finally, we show that the word "presaturated" cannot be replaced by "precipitous" in the theorems above: Martin's Maximum (which implies SRP and the Tree Property at ω2) is consistent with a precipitous tower on GICω1.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…