Superconductivity in the Cuprates: Deduction of Mechanism for D-Wave Pairing Through Analysis of ARPES

Abstract

In the Eliashberg integral equations for d-wave superconductivity, two different functions (α2 F)n(ω, θ) and (α2 F)p,d(ω) determine, respectively, the "normal" and the "pairing" self-energies. We present a quantitative analysis of the high-resolution laser based ARPES data on the compound Bi-2212 to deduce the function(α2 F)n(ω, θ). Besides its detailed ω dependence, we find the remarkable result that this function is nearly independent of θ between the (π,π)-direction and 25 degrees from it. Assuming that the same fluctuations determine both the normal and the pairing self-energy, we ask what theories give the function (α2 F)p,d(ω) required for the d-wave pairing instability at high temperatures as well as the deduced (α2 F)n(θ, ω). We show that the deduced (α2 F)n(θ, ω) can only be obtained from Antiferromagnetic (AFM) fluctuations if their correlation length is smaller than a lattice constant. Using (α2 F)p,d(ω) consistent with such a correlation length and the symmetry of matrix-elements scattering fermions off AFM fluctuations, we calculate Tc an show that AFM fluctuations are excluded as the pairing mechanism for d-wave superconductivity in cuprates. We also consider the quantum-critical fluctuations derived microscopically as the fluctuations of the observed loop-current order discovered in the under-doped cuprates. We show that their frequency dependence and the momentum dependence of their matrix-elements to scatter fermions are consistent with the θ and ω dependence of the deduced (α2 F)n(ω, θ). The pairing kernel (α2 F)p,d(ω) calculated using the experimental values in the Eliashberg equation gives d-wave instability at Tc comparable to the experiments.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…