On the decay of crossing numbers of sparse graphs
Abstract
Richter and Thomassen proved that every graph has an edge e such that the crossing number (G-e) of G-e is at least (2/5)(G) - O(1). Fox and Cs. T\'oth proved that dense graphs have large sets of edges (proportional in the total number of edges) whose removal leaves a graph with crossing number proportional to the crossing number of the original graph; this result was later strenghtened by Cern\'y, Kyncl and G. T\'oth. These results make our understanding of the decay of crossing numbers in dense graphs essentially complete. In this paper we prove a similar result for large sparse graphs in which the number of edges is not artificially inflated by operations such as edge subdivisions. We also discuss the connection between the decay of crossing numbers and expected crossing numbers, a concept recently introduced by Mohar and Tamon.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.