Remarks about Dyson's instability in the large-N limit
Abstract
There are known examples of perturbative expansions in the 't Hooft coupling lt with a finite radius of convergence. This seems to contradict Dyson's argument suggesting that the instability at negative coupling implies a zero radius of convergence. Using the example of the linear sigma model in three dimensions, we discuss to which extent the two points of view are compatible. We show that a saddle point persists for negative values of lt until a critical value -|ltc| is reached. A numerical study of the perturbative series for the renormalized mass confirms an expected singularity of the form (lt +|ltc|)1/2. However, for -|ltc|< lt <0, the effective potential does not exist if phi2 >phi2max(lt) and not at all if lt<-|ltc|. We show that phi2max(lt) propto 1/|lt | for small negative lt. The finite radius of convergence can be justified if the effective theory is defined with a large field cutoff phi2max(lt) which provides a quantitative measure of the departure from the original model considered.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.