Solving the Odd Perfect Number Problem: Some Old and New Approaches

Abstract

A perfect number is a positive integer N such that the sum of all the positive divisors of N equals 2N, denoted by σ(N) = 2N. The question of the existence of odd perfect numbers (OPNs) is one of the longest unsolved problems of number theory. This thesis presents some of the old as well as new approaches to solving the OPN Problem. In particular, a conjecture predicting an injective and surjective mapping X = σ(pk)/pk, Y = σ(m2)/m2 between OPNs N = pkm2 (with Euler factor pk) and rational points on the hyperbolic arc XY = 2 with 1 < X < 1.25 < 1.6 < Y < 2 and 2.85 < X + Y < 3, is disproved. Various results on the abundancy index and solitary numbers are used in the disproof. Numerical evidence against the said conjecture will likewise be discussed. We will show that if an OPN N has the form above, then pk < (2/3)m2 follows from D10. We will also attempt to prove a conjectured improvement of this last result to pk < m by observing that σ(pk)/m ≠ 1 and σ(pk)/m ≠ σ(m)/pk in all cases. Lastly, we also prove the following generalization: If N = Πi=1r piαi is the canonical factorization of an OPN N, then σ(piαi) ≤ (2/3)Npiαi for all i. This gives rise to the inequality N2 - r ≤ (1/3)(2/3)r - 1 which is true for all r, where r = ω(N) is the number of distinct prime factors of N.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…