Relativizing Small Complexity Classes and their Theories

Abstract

Existing definitions of the relativizations of , \ and \ do not preserve the inclusions ⊂eq , ⊂eq . We start by giving the first definitions that preserve them. Here for \ and \ we define their relativizations using Wilson's stack oracle model, but limit the height of the stack to a constant (instead of (n)). We show that the collapse of any two classes in \, , , , \ implies the collapse of their relativizations. Next we exhibit an oracle α that makes (α) a proper hierarchy. This strengthens and clarifies the separations of the relativized theories in [Takeuti, 1995]. The idea is that a circuit whose nested depth of oracle gates is bounded by k cannot compute correctly the (k+1) compositions of every oracle function. Finally we develop theories that characterize the relativizations of subclasses of \ by modifying theories previously defined by the second two authors. A function is provably total in a theory iff it is in the corresponding relativized class, and hence the oracle separations imply separations for the relativized theories.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…