Solving the Odd Perfect Number Problem: Some New Approaches

Abstract

A conjecture predicting an injective and surjective mapping X = σ(pk)pk, Y = σ(m2)m2 between OPNs N = pkm2 (with Euler factor pk) and rational points on the hyperbolic arc XY = 2 with 1 < X < 1.25 < 1.6 < Y < 2 and 2.85 < X + Y < 3, is disproved. We will show that if an OPN N has the form above, then pk < 2/3m2. We then give a somewhat weaker corollary to this last result (m2 - pk 8) and give possible improvements along these lines. We will also attempt to prove a conjectured improvement to pk < m by observing that σ(pk)m 1 and σ(pk)m σ(m)pk in all cases. Lastly, we also prove the following generalization: If N = Πi = 1rpiαi is the canonical factorization of an OPN N, then σ(piαi) (2/3)Npiαi for all i. This gives rise to the inequality N2 - r (1/3)(2/3)r - 1, which is true for all r, where r = ω(N) is the number of distinct prime factors of N.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…