Families that remain k-Sperner even after omitting an element of their ground set

Abstract

A family ⊂eq 2[n] of sets is said to be l-trace k-Sperner if for any l-subset L ⊂ [n] the family |L=\F|L:F ∈ \=\F L: F ∈ \ is k-Sperner, i.e. does not contain any chain of length k+1. The maximum size that an l-trace k-Sperner family ⊂eq 2[n] can have is denoted by f(n,k,l). For pairs of integers l<k, if in a family every pair of sets satisfies ||G1|-|G2||<k-l, then possesses the (n-l)-trace k-Sperner property. Among such families, the largest one is 0=\F∈ 2[n]: n-(k-l)2+1 |F| n-(k-l)2 +k-l\ and also '0=\F∈ 2[n]: n-(k-l)2 |F| n-(k-l)2 +k-l-1\ if n-(k-l) is even. In an earlier paper, we proved that this is asymptotically optimal for all pair of integers l<k, i.e. f(n,k,n-l)=(1+o(1))|0|. In this paper we consider the case when l=1, k 2, and prove that f(n,k,n-1)=|0| provided n is large enough. We also prove that the unique (n-1)-trace k-Sperner family with size f(n,k,n-1) is 0 and also '0 when n+k is odd.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…