Lyndon words and Fibonacci numbers

Abstract

It is a fundamental property of non-letter Lyndon words that they can be expressed as a concatenation of two shorter Lyndon words. This leads to a naive lower bound log2(n) + 1 for the number of distinct Lyndon factors that a Lyndon word of length n must have, but this bound is not optimal. In this paper we show that a much more accurate lower bound is logphi(n) + 1, where phi denotes the golden ratio (1 + sqrt5)/2. We show that this bound is optimal in that it is attained by the Fibonacci Lyndon words. We then introduce a mapping Lx that counts the number of Lyndon factors of length at most n in an infinite word x. We show that a recurrent infinite word x is aperiodic if and only if Lx >= Lf, where f is the Fibonacci infinite word, with equality if and only if f is in the shift orbit closure of f.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…