Reducing a Target Interval to a Few Exact Queries
Abstract
Many combinatorial problems involving weights can be formulated as a so-called ranged problem. That is, their input consists of a universe U, a (succinctly-represented) set family F ⊂eq 2U, a weight function ω:U → \1,...,N\, and integers 0 ≤ l ≤ u ≤ ∞. Then the problem is to decide whether there is an X ∈ F such that l ≤ Σe ∈ Xω(e) ≤ u. Well-known examples of such problems include Knapsack, Subset Sum, Maximum Matching, and Traveling Salesman. In this paper, we develop a generic method to transform a ranged problem into an exact problem (i.e. a ranged problem for which l=u). We show that our method has several intriguing applications in exact exponential algorithms and parameterized complexity, namely: - In exact exponential algorithms, we present new insight into whether Subset Sum and Knapsack have efficient algorithms in both time and space. In particular, we show that the time and space complexity of Subset Sum and Knapsack are equivalent up to a small polynomial factor in the input size. We also give an algorithm that solves sparse instances of Knapsack efficiently in terms of space and time. - In parameterized complexity, we present the first kernelization results on weighted variants of several well-known problems. In particular, we show that weighted variants of Vertex Cover, Dominating Set, Traveling Salesman and Knapsack all admit polynomial randomized Turing kernels when parameterized by |U|. Curiously, our method relies on a technique more commonly found in approximation algorithms.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.