On extracting common random bits from correlated sources on large alphabets
Abstract
Suppose Alice and Bob receive strings X=(X1,...,Xn) and Y=(Y1,...,Yn) each uniformly random in [s]n but so that X and Y are correlated . For each symbol i, we have that Yi = Xi with probability 1- and otherwise Yi is chosen independently and uniformly from [s]. Alice and Bob wish to use their respective strings to extract a uniformly chosen common sequence from [s]k but without communicating. How well can they do? The trivial strategy of outputting the first k symbols yields an agreement probability of (1 - + /s)k. In a recent work by Bogdanov and Mossel it was shown that in the binary case where s=2 and k = k() is large enough then it is possible to extract k bits with a better agreement probability rate. In particular, it is possible to achieve agreement probability (k)-1/2 · 2-k/(2(1 - /2)) using a random construction based on Hamming balls, and this is optimal up to lower order terms. In the current paper we consider the same problem over larger alphabet sizes s and we show that the agreement probability rate changes dramatically as the alphabet grows. In particular we show no strategy can achieve agreement probability better than (1-)k (1+δ(s))k where δ(s) 0 as s ∞. We also show that Hamming ball based constructions have much lower agreement probability rate than the trivial algorithm as s ∞. Our proofs and results are intimately related to subtle properties of hypercontractive inequalities.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.