Counts of high-redshift GRBs as probe of primordial non-Gaussianities

Abstract

We propose to use high-redshift long γ-ray bursts (GRBs) as cosmological tools to constrain the amount of primordial non-Gaussianity in the density field. By using numerical, N-body, hydrodynamic, chemistry simulations of different cosmological volumes with various Gaussian and non-Gaussian models, we self-consistently relate the cosmic star formation rate density to the corresponding GRB rate. Assuming that GRBs are fair tracers of cosmic star formation, we find that positive local non-Gaussianities, described in terms of the non-linear parameter, , might boost significantly the GRB rate at high redshift, z 6. Deviations with respect to the Gaussian case account for a few orders of magnitude if 1000, one order of magnitude for 100, and a factor of 2 for 50. These differences are found only at large redshift, while at later times the rates tend to converge. Furthermore, a comparison between our predictions and the observed GRB data at z > 6 allows to exclude large negative , consistently with previous works. Future detections of any long GRB at extremely high redshift (z 15-20) could favor non-Gaussian scenarios with positive . More stringent constraints require much larger high-z GRB complete samples, currently not available in literature. By distinguishing the contributions to the GRB rate from the metal-poor population III regime, and the metal-enriched population II-I regime, we conclude that the latter is a more solid tracer of the underlying matter distribution, while the former is strongly dominated by feedback mechanisms from the first, massive, short-lived stars, rather than by possible non-Gaussian fluctuations. This holds quite independently of the assumed population III initial mass function.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…