Some remarks on the n-linear Hilbert transform for n≥ 4
Abstract
We prove that for every integer n≥ 4, the n-linear operator whose symbol is given by a product of two generic symbols of n-linear Hilbert transform type, does not satisfy any Lp estimates similar to those in H\"older inequality. Then, we extend this result to multi-linear operators whose symbols are given by a product of an arbitrary number of generic symbols of n-linear Hilbert transform kind. As a consequence, under the same assumption n≥ 4,these immediately imply that for any 1< p1, ..., pn ≤ ∞ and 0<p<∞ with 1/p1 + ... + 1/pn = 1/p, there exist non-degenerate subspaces ⊂eq Rn of maximal dimension n-1, and Mikhlin symbols m singular along , for which the associated n-linear multiplier operators Tm do not map Lp1× ... × Lpn into Lp. These counterexamples are in sharp contrast with the bi-linear case, where similar operators are known to satisfy many such Lp estimates.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.