Herstein's question about simple rings with involution
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to try to answer Herstein's question concerning simple rings with involution, namely: If R is a simple ring with an involution of the first kind, with dimZ(R)R > 4 and (Z(R))≠ 2, is it true that S2=R? We shall see that in such a ring R, R=S3. We shall bring two possible criteria, each shows when R=S2. The first criterion: There exist x,y ∈ S such that xy-yx ≠ 0 and xSy ⊂eq S2 S2=R. The second criterion: There exist x,y ∈ S such that xy+yx ≠ 0 and xKy ⊂eq S2 S2=R. Actually, those results are true without any restriction on the dimension of R over Z(R). In the special case of matrices (with the transpose involution and with the symplectic involution) over a field of characteristic not equal to 2, it is not difficult to find, for example, x,y ∈ S such that xy-yx ≠ 0 and for every s ∈ S, xsy ∈ S2. Therefore, proving Herstein's remark that for matrices the answer is known to be positive. Similar results for K6, K4, K+KSK, KS+K2, SKS and S2K can also be found.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.