Comment on "Self-doping effects in cobalt silicide CoSi: Electrical, magnetic, elastic, and thermodynamic properties"

Abstract

In this Comment it is argued that Stishov et al. [Phys. Rev. B 86, 064433 (2012)] incorrectly estimated concentrations of (supposed) paramagnetic centers with μeff = 4.8μB in the investigated CoSi crystals. Correct estimation gives concentrations of such centers from 25 to 50 times smaller than reported (appr. 0.04 to 0.16% instead of appr. 2 to 4%). Also the reported data on temperature dependence of resistivity (T) of four CoSi crystals prepared in different Labs are so close to each other at T = 250 to 300K that it is extremely unlikely to be reproducible for any reasonable accuracy of resistivity measurements. These and some other problems of the paper are related to the key points of the authors argumentation. As a result their main conclusions become unjustified.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…