Non-Malleable Condensers for Arbitrary Min-Entropy, and Almost Optimal Protocols for Privacy Amplification

Abstract

Recently, the problem of privacy amplification with an active adversary has received a lot of attention. Given a shared n-bit weak random source X with min-entropy k and a security parameter s, the main goal is to construct an explicit 2-round privacy amplification protocol that achieves entropy loss O(s). Dodis and Wichs DW09 showed that optimal protocols can be achieved by constructing explicit non-malleable extractors. However, the best known explicit non-malleable extractor only achieves k=0.49n Li12b and evidence in Li12b suggests that constructing explicit non-malleable extractors for smaller min-entropy may be hard. In an alternative approach, Li Li12 introduced the notion of a non-malleable condenser and showed that explicit non-malleable condensers also give optimal privacy amplification protocols. In this paper, we give the first construction of non-malleable condensers for arbitrary min-entropy. Using our construction, we obtain a 2-round privacy amplification protocol with optimal entropy loss for security parameter up to s=(k). This is the first protocol that simultaneously achieves optimal round complexity and optimal entropy loss for arbitrary min-entropy k. We also generalize this result to obtain a protocol that runs in O(s/k) rounds with optimal entropy loss, for security parameter up to s=(k). This significantly improves the protocol in ckor. Finally, we give a better non-malleable condenser for linear min-entropy, and in this case obtain a 2-round protocol with optimal entropy loss for security parameter up to s=(k), which improves the entropy loss and communication complexity of the protocol in Li12b.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…