On the Parameterized and Approximation Hardness of Metric Dimension

Abstract

The NP-hard Metric Dimension problem is to decide for a given graph G and a positive integer k whether there is a vertex subset of size at most k that separates all vertex pairs in G. Herein, a vertex v separates a pair u,w if the distance (length of a shortest path) between v and u is different from the distance of v and w. We give a polynomial-time computable reduction from the Bipartite Dominating Set problem to Metric Dimension on maximum degree three graphs such that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the solution sets of both problems. There are two main consequences of this: First, it proves that Metric Dimension on maximum degree three graphs is W[2]-complete with respect to the parameter k. This answers an open question concerning the parameterized complexity of Metric Dimension posed by D\'iaz et al. [ESA'12] and already mentioned by Lokshtanov [Dagstuhl seminar, 2009]. Additionally, it implies that Metric Dimension cannot be solved in no(k) time, unless the assumption FPT ≠ W[1] fails. This proves that a trivial nO(k) algorithm is probably asymptotically optimal. Second, as Bipartite Dominating Set is inapproximable within o(log n), it follows that Metric Dimension on maximum degree three graphs is also inapproximable by a factor of o(log n), unless NP=P. This strengthens the result of Hauptmann et al. [JDA 2012] who proved APX-hardness on bounded-degree graphs.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…