Tunneling conductance due to discrete spectrum of Andreev states

Abstract

We study tunneling spectroscopy of discrete subgap Andreev states in a superconducting system. If the tunneling coupling is weak, individual levels are resolved and the conductance G(V) at small temperatures is composed of a set of resonant Lorentz peaks which cannot be described within perturbation theory over tunnelling strength. We establish a general formula for their widths and heights and show that the width of any peak scales as normal-state tunnel conductance, while its height is 2e2/h and depends only on contact geometry and the spatial profile of the resonant Andreev level. We also establish an exact formula for the single-channel conductance that takes the whole Andreev spectrum into account. We use it to study the interference of Andreev reflection processes through different levels. The effect is most pronounced at low voltages, where an Andreev level at Ej and its conjugate at -Ej interfere destructively. This interference leads to the quantization of the zero-bias conductance: G(0) equals 2e2/h (or 0) if there is (there is not) a Majorana fermion in the spectrum, in agreement with previous results from S-matrix theory. We also study G(eV>0) for a system with a pair of almost decoupled Majorana fermions with splitting E0 and show that at lowest E0 there is a zero-bias Lorentz peak of width W as expected for a single Majorana fermion (a topological NS-junction) with a narrow dip of width E02/W at zero bias, which ensures G(0)=0 (the NS-junction remains trivial on a very small energy scale). As the coupling W gets stronger, the dip becomes narrower, which can be understood as enhanced decoupling of the remote Majorana fermion. Then the zero-bias dip requires extremely low temperatures T E02/W to be observed.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…